Black Student Enrollment at Harvard Law Drops by HALF  After Supreme Court Ruling on Affirmative Action
#image_title

Black Student Enrollment at Harvard Law Drops by HALF After Supreme Court Ruling on Affirmative Action


Share this post

Black student enrollment at Harvard Law School has significantly decreased following the U.S. Supreme Court's 2023 decision to reject race-based admissions. The ruling deemed the consideration of race in college admissions a violation of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

The New York Times reported on Monday that Harvard Law School's incoming class includes only 19 Black students, representing 3.4% of the class — the lowest figure since the 1960s. This marks a steep decline from the 43 Black students who enrolled in the first-year class the previous year, according to data from the American Bar Association.

In response, Jeff Neal, a spokesperson for Harvard Law, reaffirmed the institution's commitment to diversity. "Harvard Law School continues to believe that a student body composed of persons with a wide variety of backgrounds and experiences is a vital component of legal education," Neal said in a statement to The Times. He added that the law school is dedicated to both complying with the Supreme Court's decision and fostering a diverse community.

Neal also emphasized the difficulty of drawing conclusions from a single year of data, telling Fox News Digital that the full impact of the Supreme Court's decision remains uncertain. "It was understood that the decision would impact, in ways that could not be fully anticipated, the ability of educational institutions across the nation to attract and admit a diverse cohort of students," he said.

However, not all at Harvard share this cautious optimism. Harvard Law Professor David B. Wilkins, an expert on Black representation in the legal profession, described the drop in Black enrollment as unprecedented. "This obviously has a lot to do with the chilling effect created by that decision. This is the lowest number of Black entering first-year students since 1965," Wilkins said. He noted that prior to 1965, Harvard Law admitted just 15 Black students, but since 1970, the first-year class has typically included 50 to 70 Black students.

Faculty members have also observed a decline in Black male students, with only six enrolling in the current first-year class. Sean Wynn, president of the Harvard Black Law Students Association, described the enrollment decline as a "crushing loss" and argued that the ruling has fundamentally altered the experience of attending Harvard Law School.

The decrease in Black enrollment is not the only significant racial impact of the Supreme Court’s decision. The New York Times reported that Hispanic enrollment at Harvard Law also fell sharply, from 11% (63 students) in 2023 to 6.9% (39 students) in 2024. Conversely, enrollment of white and Asian students increased.

Despite the decline at Harvard, some experts see broader positive trends. UCLA Law Professor Richard Sander, a critic of affirmative action, highlighted a 3% increase in the overall number of Black law students nationwide, rising from 2,969 in 2023 to 3,060 in 2024. Sander noted, however, that this increase might be influenced by changes in reporting practices, and the data does not account for multiracial students or those who declined to report their race.

Sander also suggested that the decline in Black enrollment at elite institutions like Harvard might be beneficial for some students. "Those students are going to go to another school where they’re better matched and they’re poised to succeed," he argued.

As the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling continue to unfold, institutions like Harvard Law face the challenge of maintaining diversity within the constraints of the new legal landscape. The broader impact on legal education and the profession remains to be seen.


Share this post
Comments

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
US Revokes Colombian President Gustavo Petro’s Visa Over ‘Reckless and Incendiary’ Remarks

US Revokes Colombian President Gustavo Petro’s Visa Over ‘Reckless and Incendiary’ Remarks

The US has said it will revoke Colombian President Gustavo Petro's visa, after he urged US soldiers to disobey his American counterpart Donald Trump during remarks at a rally in New York.  The State Department described Petro's comments at a pro-Palestinian street protest on Friday as "reckless and incendiary". The Colombian leader was in the US for the UN General Assembly, where earlier this week he called for a criminal inquiry into the Trump administration's airstrikes on alleged drug-traff


O A

Nas Secures a $5.5B Queens Casino Deal as Jay-Z’s Bid Falls Short

Nas Secures a $5.5B Queens Casino Deal as Jay-Z’s Bid Falls Short

Nas has become a central figure in a massive new project that will bring a $5.5 billion Resorts World Casino to Queens. The decision came after a vote from the New York State Gaming Commission, officially placing the development in the rapper’s hometown. While Nas did not attend the meeting where the deal was sealed, the moment still turned into a headline-worthy exchange. Queens Borough President Donovan Richards used the opportunity to take a swipe at Jay-Z, whose proposal to open a Caesars


O A

Doja Cat Returns to Pop With New Album Vie

Doja Cat Returns to Pop With New Album Vie

Doja Cat is back to being a pop star on her new album Vie. The 15-track project dropped on Friday (Sept. 26) and includes one feature from Doja’s “Kiss Me More“ sister, SZA. The album also includes the lead single “Jealous Type,” which Doja performed at the 2025 VMAs alongside celebrated saxophonist Kenny G. Doja previously said this album would be more pop-lenient compared to her 2023 rap album Scarlet, and will focus on love, romance, and sex. She made good on that promise, as Vie‘s sound nev


O A

Amazon to Pay $2.5 Billion Over Prime Subscription Tactics

Amazon to Pay $2.5 Billion Over Prime Subscription Tactics

Amazon has agreed to pay $2.5 billion to resolve allegations that the company used deceptive tactics to enroll users in its Prime subscription service and intentionally created a complicated cancellation process. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiated the lawsuit in 2023, alleging that the e-commerce giant employed “manipulative and deceptive” designs. According to the commission, the “sophisticated subscription traps” tricked shoppers into signing up for auto-renewing Prime memberships,


O A